| From the Introduction
People
and businesses who
never would have dealt
with each other absent the borderless world of the Internet, start
doing
business together and enter into contracts. Consumers, who were
traditionally limited to
domestic markets,
start buying abroad. Small and medium enterprises enter international
markets,
which were before reserved to larger businesses. The commercial
activities on
the net increase significantly every year. Inevitably such rapidly
increasing
activities will generate more and more disputes. How will they be
resolved?
The traditional dispute resolution systems are
most often ill equipped to provide effective redress. The competent
court may be located too far away, or be too expensive for smaller
disputes, or be too slow for business needs. Traditional arbitration
and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are also often
incapable of meeting the expectations of users for similar
reasons—even though attempts are made at improving their
efficiency. The result is a vacuum: for many of these disputes no
effective resolution mechanism will be available and access to justice
is simply not guaranteed. Given that access to justice is considered to
be a fundamental human right, this state of affairs is obviously
problematic and calls for a change.
The change may come from online dispute
resolution (ODR), i.e. from the use of electronic communications for
purposes of dispute resolution. Or stated differently, from a dispute
resolution method modeled on the very activities that give rise to the
disputes. A dispute resolution method which uses the same medium as was
used for the conclusion of the contract, and often also the performance
of the contract. A method which relies on conceptual proximity.
[...]
This is a critical time for ODR. If the
transition to a large-scale operation is mismanaged, it will never
deliver the promises it entails. On the other hand, if ODR mechanisms
are properly designed and operated, and if the legal framework is
technology friendly while securing due process, this new movement of
dispute resolution will turn e-commerce into a real marketplace. The
existence of effective means to enforce the law will boost confidence
in e-commerce, and more confidence will generate more business. At the
same time, ODR will constitute a giant step towards efficient justice
and a milestone in the history of dispute resolution. This book is
written in the hope that it may contribute to making ODR a highlight of
dispute resolution.
From the Preface
This
book is a study of online dispute resolution (ODR) from a dual
perspective. On the one hand, it is an analysis of the ODR movement,
its origins, goals, components, and evolution. This analysis is based
on a forensic observation of the present state of play. Some of the
results of this observation are published as annexes, in the form of a
survey of the services offered by 54 ODR providers and of interviews
with representatives of some of the main providers. The purpose of
these annexes is to provide the interested reader with the underlying
factual information. On the other hand, this book is a review of the
legal framework governing ODR, which primarily involves an examination
of existing arbitration and mediation laws and rules as they are
applied to online processes.
Because of the central role that the Internet
and dispute resolution play in contemporary society, this book should
appeal to all those with an interest in dispute resolution, recent
developments in arbitration and mediation, e-commerce and international
trade, globalization, interactions between information technology and
law, and the regulation of cyberspace.
|
|